DIGITAL LIBRARY
JUDGMENT, ORDERS AND MONITORING REPORTS
Judgment T-622
Monitoring Orders Of The Administrative Tribunal Of Cundinamarca
- The Administrative Tribunal of Cundinamarca, order of fulfilment verification No. 006, of January 19th of 2022, a motion for contempt was filed against the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development.
- The Administrative Tribunal of Cundinamarca, order of April 1st of 2022, resolves the motion for contempt against the Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development.
- The Administrative Tribunal of Cundinamarca, order of April 22nd of 2022, rejects the request for clarification and nullity of the order in which the motion for contempt was resolved.
- The Administrative Tribunal of Cundinamarca, order of April 3rd of 2022, grants the appeal before the Council of State against the order of April 22nd of 2022.
- The Council of State, order of June 2nd of 2022, rejects the appeal brought by the appellee officers of the Ministry of Environment.
- The Council of State, order of June 15th of 2022, resolves the established sanction measures in the motion for contempt, jurisdictional degree of consultation.
- The Administrative Tribunal of Cundinamarca, order of July 14th of 2022, orders to obey and comply with the decision of the Council of State in the jurisdictional degree of consultation.
- The Administrative Tribunal of Cundinamarca, order of fulfilment verification No. 012 of December 14th of 2022, in which the Environment, Agriculture and Health Ministries are asked to submit reports about the fulfilment of the judgment to the Tribunal’s office.
- The Constitutional Court, order of April 11th of 2023, refrained from filing a motion for contempt for the judgment T-622 and orders the Monitoring Tribunal to act diligently.
- The Administrative Tribunal of Cudinamarca, interlocutory order of August 30th of 2024, orders to include the Alta Consejería para las Regiones.
Monitoring Reports
EDUCATION
MULTIMEDIA
DOCUMENTARY | The Atrato is Life:
Armed conflict, extractive economies, and pacific resistances in Atrato
INFORMATIVE REELS
ARTICLES AND
RESEARCH PAPERS
DIGITAL LIBRARY
Invited columnists: Viviana Gonzáles and Rodrigo Rogelis, members of the Centro Sociojurídico para la Defensa Territorial Siembra, legal attorneys of the petitioners of the judgment T-622 of the Atrato River.
In order to guarantee the protection and decontamination of the Atrato River, in Chocó, Colombia, the judges of the Constitutional Court declared it a “subject of right”. Six years after the judgment, there is still a lot to do. This is a collective work with the journalist Marie Eve Detoeuf, from “Le Monde”.
The Guardians of Atrato, along with the Centro Sociojurídico Siembra, will submit next Thursday, November 3rd, a petition to the Constitutional Court for the fifth anniversary of the Judgment T-622, the first to acknowledge a River a subject of rights. In the text, the status of the implementation of the judgment is identified, and even though it has progressed, it has not been fully fulfilled.
“The judgment T-622 of the Constitutional Court? Everybody here knows it”, says José Adán Palacios, while he charges his boat on the pier of Quibdó. José Adán, who is from Bojayá, transports passengers and merchandise, and knows better than anyone this majestic River and its watersheds. “But the judgment has not changed a thing; the contamination carries on, whether it is due to the mining, deforestation, or trash”, the boatman sighs.